Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Tue Sep 9 22:47:29 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8A5lSOE016374 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:47:29 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8A5kqJl007862 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:46:52 -0700 Message-Id: <200809100546.m8A5kqJl007862@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: select() Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:46:52 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > We would only need a select on the listening socket right? Once we spawn a > process or thread with a new socket, it can be blocking right? Please see my message with timestamp "Sun 07 Sep 09:02". -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu