Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sun Sep 21 09:01:48 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8LG1mW0012622 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:01:48 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8LG3wK0000729 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:03:58 -0700 Message-Id: <200809211603.m8LG3wK0000729@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: Project 2 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:03:58 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > When calculating the average inter-arrival time do we consider those > of dropped customers/customers which are removed from the system (if > an interrupt occcurs) as well or only the ones which have been > processed. For the inter-arrival time statistics, you should could consider all customers who has "arrived" in your system. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu