Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Wed Sep 24 11:27:56 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8OIRuwH001186
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:27:56 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8OIUpss032041
	for <cs551@merlot>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:30:51 -0700
Message-Id: <200809241830.m8OIUpss032041@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: No of Customers
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:30:51 -0700
From: Bill Cheng <william@bourbon.usc.edu>

Someone wrote:

  > Should no of Customers from trace file be ignored if -n xyz
  > is present in cmd line ?

Hmm... The spec isn't clear about this.  If both -n and -t are
specified, it's probably reasonable to use the minimum of what's
specified in -n and what's in the trace file.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>