Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Wed Sep 24 20:57:14 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8P3vENn007040 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:57:14 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8P40E2L008604 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:00:14 -0700 Message-Id: <200809250400.m8P40E2L008604@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: CS 551 proj Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:00:14 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > I just wanted to a question regarding the end of simulation time. Say now 2 > customers have arrived into the system and both have been served and both > have left the system. The arrival thread is then sleeping for a time equal > to inter-arrival time. Now, when the arrival thread is sleeping if the user > presses Control C, then what is the end of simulation time? Is it the time > when Control C is pressed or when customer 2 left the system because nothing > of any note is done after customer 2 leaves the system. Thanks. I don't think this is defined in the spec. So, either way would be fine. You should probably document this in your README file. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu