Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Tue Oct 21 19:36:02 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9M2a2AB031784 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:36:02 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9M2jZ2C031421 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:45:35 -0700 Message-Id: <200810220245.m9M2jZ2C031421@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: 551 - landmark problem Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:45:35 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > In the landmark routing example in HW, the solution has the entries ordered > on the levels. Can I have it ordered on the node names (a,b,c...)? Sure! The order does not matter. > How is it stored in the routers? There is no implementation of Landmark routing! -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu