Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Tue Oct 21 19:36:02 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9M2a2AB031784
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:36:02 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9M2jZ2C031421
	for <cs551@merlot>; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:45:35 -0700
Message-Id: <200810220245.m9M2jZ2C031421@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: 551 - landmark problem
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:45:35 -0700
From: Bill Cheng <william@bourbon.usc.edu>

Someone wrote:

  > In the landmark routing example in HW, the solution has the entries ordered
  > on the levels. Can I have it ordered on the node names (a,b,c...)?

Sure!  The order does not matter.

  > How is it stored in the routers?

There is no implementation of Landmark routing!
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>