Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sat Oct 25 08:13:01 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9PFD1J5018972 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:13:01 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9PFNO2s032312 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:23:25 -0700 Message-Id: <200810251523.m9PFNO2s032312@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: 551- node-id Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:23:24 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > While logging the entries, the and are the node id's like > nunki.usc.edu_port#. > Messages like KPAV which have no body - specifically sender's hostname and > port - we cannot extract the details from there. > So we look up the table where we stored the information about our > connections, right? For a KPAV message, although the part of the log entry is empty, you still need to log and . -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu