Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Mon Oct 27 08:23:18 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9RFNIoO021043 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:23:18 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9RFYBuv003996 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:34:11 -0700 Message-Id: <200810271534.m9RFYBuv003996@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: cs551 - final - NAM Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:34:11 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > I get the following when I run nam. > nam: duplicate edge (XXXXX,YYYYY) > > This is because I add the same edge twice (once when I put in my entries, > and again when I get a response from my neighbors). > I probably will fix this once I am done with the assignment. > > Since the end result in NAM is as expected, I wanted to know whether this > will be considered as a error? This will not be considered an error. If the topology of the network is displayed properly, it's not a problem. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu