Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Mon Oct 27 08:23:18 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9RFNIoO021043
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:23:18 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9RFYBuv003996
	for <cs551@merlot>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:34:11 -0700
Message-Id: <200810271534.m9RFYBuv003996@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: cs551 - final - NAM
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:34:11 -0700
From: Bill Cheng <william@bourbon.usc.edu>

Someone wrote:

  > I get the following when I run nam.
  > nam: duplicate edge (XXXXX,YYYYY)
  > 
  > This is because I add the same edge twice (once when I put in my entries,
  > and again when I get a response from my neighbors).
  > I probably will fix this once I am done with the assignment.
  > 
  > Since the end result in NAM is as expected, I wanted to know whether this
  > will be considered as a error?

This will not be considered an error.  If the topology of the
network is displayed properly, it's not a problem.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>