Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Mon Nov 10 22:02:43 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAB62hRt014768 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:02:43 -0800 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAB5vnMt024839 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:57:49 -0800 Message-Id: <200811110557.mAB5vnMt024839@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: CS551_Final2_StoreProb Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:57:49 -0800 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > In case of the store message, if node A initiates a store message > with TTL=5 and sends it to say node B and C but Node B does not > store/forward it because of the probability returned. If node C > on the other hand stores it and then forwards to B, should node B > ignore/drop it because it has seen it before or simply compute a > new probability to determine whether to store it or not? If it has seen it, it must drop the message! -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu