Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sat Nov 22 07:40:16 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAMFeGQn002320 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:40:16 -0800 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAMFc7gJ011102 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:38:07 -0800 Message-Id: <200811221538.mAMFc7gJ011102@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: BitVector Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:38:07 -0800 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > I get the same bit vector as the ones in the grading guidelines. That would just mean that the same mistake was made! By evidence, I meant you need to tell me which bit is wrong and why it is wrong! For example, start with one word, show me all your calculation in the same way as: http://merlot.usc.edu/cs551-f08/projects/final.html#bitvecex -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Bill Cheng wrote: > Someone wrote: > > > For file v.gif with keywords : desc viterbi usc gif we get bitvector > > > > > Bit-vector=00000000000000000000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > > > 2008000000000000000000000000000000040000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > > > 0400008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000 > > > > > > while the grading guidelines says > > > > Bit-vector= \ > > 0000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000 \ > > 0000000000000000000000000000002008000000000000 \ > > 0000000000000000040000000000000000000000000000 \ > > 0000000000000000000000000040000800000000000000 \ > > 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000c00000 \ > > 00000000000000 > > > > Kindly confirm which one is correct. > > Ref: test case A 3 > > If you think my solution is incorrect, please provide > some evidence! > -- > Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu