Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sat Nov 22 08:27:24 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAMGROni002778 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:27:24 -0800 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAMGPFC7011652 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:25:15 -0800 Message-Id: <200811221625.mAMGPFC7011652@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: Question regarding get response Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:25:15 -0800 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > 1) Whenever a node gets a get response, should it store the file in its > cache too(with the cache prob) along with saving it in its cwd? I assume you are talkinag the case where this node did not initiate the GET request. Then the situation is the same as a node who did not initiate a STORE request. Please see my message with timestamp "Wed 19 Nov 19:54". > 2) If the file was in the cache of the node that initiated the get and > search, should it be copied to its permanent folder too? Please read the "Additional Notes on File Retrieval (for Part 2 only)" section of the spec. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu