Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Sun Nov 23 16:06:10 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAO06AMN021447
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:06:10 -0800
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAO04NoN027302
	for <cs551@merlot>; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:04:23 -0800
Message-Id: <200811240004.mAO04NoN027302@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: lru
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:04:23 -0800
From: Bill Cheng <william@bourbon.usc.edu>

Someone wrote:

  > should the LRU list be added from the end or from the front.

Depends on how you remove things from the list.

  > for test case 2(c)
  > node *01 and node *02 should have at most two of these files
  > 
  > -- so will these be f1.wav and f7.wav
  > or f6.wav and f7.wav

You should remove the file that was Least Recently Used!

You should justify that you are doing things correctly!
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>