Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sun Nov 23 21:18:41 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAO5If7A023804 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:18:41 -0800 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAO5GvxW031013 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:16:57 -0800 Message-Id: <200811240516.mAO5GvxW031013@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: Regarding status -files Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:16:57 -0800 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > I have a question regarding status -files. When status response is sent > to the node who initiated the request, should the sender send the > metadata of the files which are there in cache? Or it should just send > the metadata of the files which are there in permanent storage > (excluding cache)? Both types. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu