Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Mon Sep  8 22:25:42 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m895PfhO031709
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:25:41 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m895OoSJ015457
	for <cs551@merlot>; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:24:50 -0700
Message-Id: <200809090524.m895OoSJ015457@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: Delay
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:24:50 -0700
From: Bill Cheng <william@bourbon.usc.edu>

Someone wrote:

  > Should we also include a delay before we send the intial "Hello World"
  > response for the clients during  the connection establishment ?

I have no idea what's a "Hello World" response.

You need to do an artificial delay only if the server
is run with the -d commandline option.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>