Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Mon Sep 8 22:25:42 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m895PfhO031709 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:25:41 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m895OoSJ015457 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:24:50 -0700 Message-Id: <200809090524.m895OoSJ015457@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: Delay Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:24:50 -0700 From: Bill Cheng Someone wrote: > Should we also include a delay before we send the intial "Hello World" > response for the clients during the connection establishment ? I have no idea what's a "Hello World" response. You need to do an artificial delay only if the server is run with the -d commandline option. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu