Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Sat Apr 21 20:38:12 2007
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3M3cCRd015548
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:38:12 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3M3c0qN002894
	for <cs551@merlot>; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:38:00 -0700
Message-Id: <200704220338.l3M3c0qN002894@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: Question on DELETE 
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:38:00 -0700
From: william@bourbon.usc.edu

Someone wrote:

  > When deleting the local copy we only remove it from the
  > home_dir/files directory right?  We do not keep track of the
  > files in the working directory, correct?

Correct.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>



  ----- Original Message -----
  From: william@bourbon.usc.edu
  Date: Friday, April 13, 2007 3:19 pm
  Subject: Re: Question on DELETE
  To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
  
  > Someone wrote:
  > 
  >  > 	Say two nodes have the same copy of a file (filename, nonce, and
  >  > sha1), and one of them try to 'delete'. It first tries to 
  > delete the local
  >  > copy, however the signature verification fails. Should it stop 
  > or continue
  >  > flooding out Delete to other nodes?
  > 
  > Yes.  I guess it's possible that the local copy is somehow corrupted.
  > --
  > Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu 
  > <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>