Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu Delivery-Date: Sun Apr 22 19:44:53 2007 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on merlot.usc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75]) by merlot.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3N2irOO021680 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:44:53 -0700 Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3N2ibMN008843 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:44:37 -0700 Message-Id: <200704230244.l3N2ibMN008843@bourbon.usc.edu> To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu Subject: Re: kwrd,name,sha1 index files format Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:44:37 -0700 From: william@bourbon.usc.edu Someone wrote: > Is there a specific format for writing names,keywords and sha > values into name_index,kwrd_index and sha1_index files? No. It's your design decision. If you haven't implemented this yet, since it's only a few hours away from the submission deadline, I think the best way to spend your time is to review the grading guidelines and get some bugs out and try to get as many points as possible instead of implement something new and risk breaking something that's already working. -- Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu