Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Mon Apr 30 21:53:39 2007
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l414rd7L006269
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:53:39 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l414qrGN000926
	for <cs551@merlot>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:52:53 -0700
Message-Id: <200705010452.l414qrGN000926@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: Re B's Routing Table 
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:52:53 -0700
From: william@bourbon.usc.edu

Someone wrote:

  > I would like to know whether the slide no 23 in Freenet the 2
  > routing tables named B's Routing Table are correct or whether
  > therre is a typo and it is A's routin table?

Oops!  You are correct.  From slides 21 through 23, it should
say A's Routing Table right on top of node A.  Thanks for
catching it.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>