Return-Path: william@bourbon.usc.edu
Delivery-Date: Mon May  7 20:24:18 2007
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on merlot.usc.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.3
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (bourbon.usc.edu [128.125.9.75])
	by merlot.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l483OILA025760
	for <cs551@merlot.usc.edu>; Mon, 7 May 2007 20:24:18 -0700
Received: from bourbon.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by bourbon.usc.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l483N7AF009032
	for <cs551@merlot>; Mon, 7 May 2007 20:23:07 -0700
Message-Id: <200705080323.l483N7AF009032@bourbon.usc.edu>
To: cs551@merlot.usc.edu
Subject: Re: lecture 28 slide 33 
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 20:23:07 -0700
From: william@bourbon.usc.edu

Someone wrote:

  > In slide 33 here the data get fdropped becoz of RPF or becoz of
  > Truncated RPF???
  > 
  > I believe TRPF. Wht do you think?

I'm not sure what truncated RPF is.  But I think RPF works here.
--
Bill Cheng // bill.cheng@usc.edu <URL:http://merlot.usc.edu/william/usc/>